首页> 外文OA文献 >Facilitating Scholarly Writing in Academic Medicine: Lessons Learned from a Collaborative Peer Mentoring Program
【2h】

Facilitating Scholarly Writing in Academic Medicine: Lessons Learned from a Collaborative Peer Mentoring Program

机译:促进学术医学领域的学术写作:从协作式同伴辅导计划中学到的经验教训

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Scholarly writing is a critical skill for faculty in academic medicine; however, few faculty receive instruction in the process. We describe the experience of 18 assistant professors who participated in a writing and faculty development program which consisted of 7 monthly 75-minute sessions embedded in a Collaborative Mentoring Program (CMP). Participants identified barriers to writing, developed personal writing strategies, had time to write, and completed monthly writing contracts. Participants provided written responses to open-ended questions about the learning experience, and at the end of the program, participants identified manuscripts submitted for publication, and completed an audiotaped interview. Analysis of qualitative data using data reduction, data display, and conclusion drawing/verification showed that this writing program facilitated the knowledge, skills, and support needed to foster writing productivity. All participants completed at least 1 scholarly manuscript by the end of the CMP. The impact on participants’ future academic productivity requires long-term follow-up.
机译:学术写作是学术医学教师的一项关键技能。但是,在此过程中很少有教师会接受指导。我们描述了18位助理教授的经验,他们参与了写作和教师发展计划,该计划包括嵌入在协作指导计划(CMP)中的每月7个月的75分钟课程。参与者确定了写作障碍,制定了个人写作策略,有时间写作,并完成了每月的写作合同。参与者提供了有关学习经历的开放式问题的书面答复,并且在计划结束时,参与者确定了要出版的手稿,并完成了录音采访。使用数据约简,数据显示和结论图/验证对定性数据进行的分析表明,该写作计划有助于提高写作效率所需的知识,技能和支持。到CMP结束时,所有参与者至少完成了1篇学术手稿。对参与者未来学术生产力的影响需要长期跟进。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号